ArticleCardiology research2026
Role of Intracoronary Imaging in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for In-Stent Restenosis: A Prospective Observational Study.
Article in Cardiology research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Despite advances in contemporary stent technology and procedural techniques, in-stent restenosis (ISR) remains a clinically significant cause of repeat revascularization. Coronary angiography, although the standard diagnostic modality, has limited ability to identify the underlying mechanism of ISR. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) may improve mechanism-based decision-making and procedural optimization. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of intracoronary imaging on ISR mechanism identification and treatment strategy during ISR percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods: This prospective observational study included 34 patients with 40 ISR lesions (60 previously implanted stents) undergoing IVUS- or OCT-guided PCI at a tertiary care center. Patients underwent detailed assessment of cardiovascular risk factors, angiographic classification of ISR, and systematic intracoronary imaging analysis. ISR lesions were classified as mechanically driven or tissue-proliferative based on imaging findings. The primary objective was to assess the impact of imaging on lesion preparation and definitive treatment strategy. Results: The mean age was 63 years, and 82.4% were male. Diffuse ISR was present in 57.5% of lesions. Intracoronary imaging identified mechanical and tissue-proliferative ISR in equal proportions (50% each). Mechanical ISR was more frequently associated with earlier presentation and structural complexity, including multisegment involvement and stent overlap zones. Intravascular imaging led to escalation of lesion modification strategies in 50% of lesions. Before imaging, drug-eluting balloon (DEB) therapy was planned in 55% and drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation in 15% of cases. Following imaging, DES implantation was performed in 50% of lesions, representing a significant shift in treatment strategy (McNemar test, P = 0.021). Conclusion: Both mechanical and tissue-proliferative mechanisms contributed substantially to ISR. Intracoronary imaging clarified the dominant ISR mechanism, guided lesion preparation, and modified definitive treatment strategy. These findings suggest a mechanism-based role for IVUS/OCT in lesion assessment and procedural planning during ISR PCI. Larger comparative studies with longer follow-up are required to determine whether imaging-guided ISR PCI improves clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.