Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42326965›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2026

The association between adolescents' recreational screen exposure and academic performance and its mediating mechanisms.

Jianping Zhao, Jianyi Zhao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jianping ZhaoMental Health Education Center, Xinxiang Vocational and Technical College, Xinxiang, Henan, China.
Jianyi ZhaoBasic Course Teaching Department, Xinxiang Vocational and Technical College, Xinxiang, Henan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research background: With the widespread use of digital media, adolescents' screen time has increased significantly. The relationship between screen time and academic performance has become a research focus in education and public health. However, existing findings are inconsistent, and mechanism-based studies focusing on Chinese adolescents-who experience high academic pressure-are scarce. Grounded in cognitive load and self-regulation theories, this study explores the relationship between recreational screen exposure and academic performance among Chinese adolescents and examines its underlying mechanisms, providing empirical evidence for screen use management. Methods: A total of 175 middle school students from the China Education Panel Survey (CEPS), conducted between June 2023 and December 2025, were selected. Multiple linear regression analysis investigated the association between recreational screen exposure and academic performance. Heterogeneity of screen exposure types was analyzed using Results: Screen time was significantly negatively associated with Chinese (β = -0.029, Conclusion: Recreational screen exposure has a robust negative effect on academic performance, with online gaming posing a significantly greater risk than television use. Screen exposure primarily impairs academic performance indirectly by disrupting sleep, increasing cognitive load, and reducing emotional regulation. This study provides localized evidence for the refined management of adolescents' digital behaviors.

Indexed as

Academic PerformanceAdolescent BehaviorRecreationScreen TimeStudentsAdolescentChinaDigital MediaFemaleHumansMaleMedia ExposureSurveys and QuestionnairesTelevisionVideo Gamesacademic performanceadolescentscognitive load theorymediating mechanismsrecreational screen exposure

Identifiers

PMID42326965
PMCPMC13279602

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.