Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42326962›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2026

Between dissonance and desire-queer(ing) adaptive rituals of conformity: wit(h)nessing inequities and social justice in healthcare education in the Global South through body pedagogies.

Mark A Vicars, Renaissan Dutta, Emilie Das, Shuvojit Moulik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mark A VicarsISILC, CoABLIT, Victoria University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Renaissan DuttaCWF Labs, Transdisciplinary Healthcare and Research, Bolpur, West Bengal, India.
Emilie DasCivilian Welfare Foundation, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Shuvojit MoulikSantosh Deemed to be University, Ghaziabad, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The state of healthcare education in the Global South is at a critical point of change. In general terms, the introduction of LGBTQIA+ health content into curricula is widely accepted as an important contribution and a step toward acceptance of gender diversity and inclusion. However, the actual way of teaching this content oftentimes simply continues to perpetuate violence against LGBTQIA+ people and, by extension, their communities. In other words, the historical patterns of teaching LGBTQIA+ people as "problems" (i.e., as pathological entities that need intervention), as at-risk groups that need to be managed, and as an example of how not to be healthy are continued by most educators despite the existence of LGBTQIA+ health content. The way that LGBTQIA+ health content is taught in the Global South reflects the influence of historical power relations that are built into medical education systems inherited from colonial powers as allied health practitioners and medical institutions continue to control whose bodies will be seen as worthy, acceptable, and validated as being a part of the "normal" world and as a result who will have access to health care services. There is limited attention to how LGBTQIA+ body pedagogies can serve as counter-practices to reimagine care, learning, and inclusion in the contexts outlined previously. This study analyzes how body pedagogies can disorient reductionist and interventionist approaches to LGBTQIA+ identities in health care education in the Global South.

Indexed as

Education, MedicalSocial JusticeCurriculumFemaleHumansbody pedagogiesGlobal Southhealth care educationLGBTQIA+wit(h)nessing

Identifiers

PMID42326962
PMCPMC13279512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.