Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42326943›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2026

The future of U.S. social prescribing: foundations, implementation, and leadership summit insights.

Alan Siegel, Barry Zuckerman, Ardeshir Z Hashmi, Serena Shapard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alan SiegelUCSF Medical Center, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Barry ZuckermanBoston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, United States.
Ardeshir Z HashmiCleveland Clinic Center for Geriatric Medicine, Cleveland, OH, United States.
Serena ShapardBryn Mawr College, Bryn Mawr, PA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The U.S. healthcare system is confronting at least three converging crises: a rapidly aging population with complex needs, rising prevalence of mental illness, and an epidemic of social isolation that contributes substantially to morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. Current clinical approaches cannot meet demand due to persistent workforce shortages, limited treatment capacity, and variable patient adherence. Social prescribing (SP), which systematically connects patients from healthcare settings to community-based non-clinical supports, including social, cultural, physical activity, and nature-based programs, has been developed in over 30 countries and is emerging in the United States as a promising adjunct to clinical care. This paper synthesizes epidemiologic, economic, and implementation evidence to examine the role of SP in addressing these strains on domestic healthcare infrastructure. Drawing on data from a national survey of SP movement leaders ahead of the 2025 U.S. SP Leadership Summit, we identify key barriers and opportunities across patients, clinicians, community partners, and health systems. Major challenges include limited awareness, fragmented referral pathways, measurement deficits, and a complex multi-payer environment. Despite these barriers, substantial opportunities exist to align SP with U.S. public health priorities, including mental health prevention, health equity, social drivers of health, lifestyle medicine, and value-based care. We argue that SP represents a low-risk and high-value strategy to improve wellbeing and reduce healthcare burden by formally recognizing the importance of social connection to health outcomes. Strategic investment in policy frameworks, sustainable financing, workforce development, technology, and research is essential to supporting system-wide adoption of SP in the United States.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareLeadershipSocial PrescribingForecastingHumansUnited Statesagingarts prescribingnature prescribingsocial connectionsocial drivers of healthsocial healthsocial prescribing

Identifiers

PMID42326943
PMCPMC13275706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.