ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
The future of U.S. social prescribing: foundations, implementation, and leadership summit insights.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Commentary: The future of U.S. social prescribing: foundations, implementation, and leadership summit insights.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The U.S. healthcare system is confronting at least three converging crises: a rapidly aging population with complex needs, rising prevalence of mental illness, and an epidemic of social isolation that contributes substantially to morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. Current clinical approaches cannot meet demand due to persistent workforce shortages, limited treatment capacity, and variable patient adherence. Social prescribing (SP), which systematically connects patients from healthcare settings to community-based non-clinical supports, including social, cultural, physical activity, and nature-based programs, has been developed in over 30 countries and is emerging in the United States as a promising adjunct to clinical care. This paper synthesizes epidemiologic, economic, and implementation evidence to examine the role of SP in addressing these strains on domestic healthcare infrastructure. Drawing on data from a national survey of SP movement leaders ahead of the 2025 U.S. SP Leadership Summit, we identify key barriers and opportunities across patients, clinicians, community partners, and health systems. Major challenges include limited awareness, fragmented referral pathways, measurement deficits, and a complex multi-payer environment. Despite these barriers, substantial opportunities exist to align SP with U.S. public health priorities, including mental health prevention, health equity, social drivers of health, lifestyle medicine, and value-based care. We argue that SP represents a low-risk and high-value strategy to improve wellbeing and reduce healthcare burden by formally recognizing the importance of social connection to health outcomes. Strategic investment in policy frameworks, sustainable financing, workforce development, technology, and research is essential to supporting system-wide adoption of SP in the United States.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.