Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42326931›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2026

Exposure to e-cigarette content on social media and its association with risk perception, perceived benefits, and vaping perceptions among college students: a cross-sectional study.

Saud A Alsulaiman, Ezaddeen S Almutairi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Saud A AlsulaimanDepartment of Mass Communication, College of Humanities and Social Sciences, Riyadh, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Ezaddeen S AlmutairiDepartment of Mass Communication, College of Humanities and Social Sciences, Riyadh, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: This study investigates college students' overall perceptions of vaping, risk perceptions, and perceived benefits of e-cigarettes through the lens of the Health Belief Model (HBM), in relation to social media use and exposure to e-cigarette-related conten. Methods: This cross-sectional study used validated and reliable measures to assess perceptions of e-cigarettes among college students ( Results: The findings suggested that the majority of college students (90%) use social media daily, and more than 57% of students who had seen e-cigarette-related content reported encountering it through influencer or followed accounts. The findings showed that exposure to e-cigarette content on social media was not associated with regular vaping, whereas with modest explanatory power, greater risk perception was associated with lower vaping use among college students [OR = 0.93, 95% CI (0.88, 0.97), Conclusion: Unlike other studies conducted among teens and adolescents, our study did not find significant relationships between exposure to e-cigarette content on social media and vaping use. However, perceived benefits and risk perceptions were found to be significantly associated with the overall vaping perceptions and vaping use among college students. The study ultimately shows that although exposure to e-cigarette content is common on social media, it does not appear to meaningfully shape how college students judge the risks of vaping.

Indexed as

Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsSocial MediaStudentsVapingAdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMedia ExposurePerceptionRisk AssessmentSaudi ArabiaSurveys and QuestionnairesUniversitiescollege studentse-cigaretteperceived benefitsrisk perceptionssocial media usevaping

Identifiers

PMID42326931
PMCPMC13275691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.