ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Digital navigation as an access barrier: waiting times, equity, and universal health coverage in a digitalizing health system.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Universal Health Coverage (UHC) aims to ensure equitable access to timely and appropriate healthcare without financial hardship. Under persistent capacity constraints, access is increasingly governed through non-financial mechanisms such as waiting times. Digitalization is widely promoted to improve efficiency and sustain UHC, yet its equity implications remain contested. Methods: This qualitative study examines how digitalization reshapes healthcare in Tyrol, Austria, a health system with near-universal health insurance coverage and urban-rural disparities. Drawing on 222 in-depth interviews conducted between 2020 and 2025, the analysis triangulates perspectives from individuals experiencing access vulnerabilities related to financial or digital access constraints, contrast cases with greater access resources, and healthcare experts. Data were analyzed using inductive qualitative content analysis with systematic cross-group comparison. Results: Digitalization does not eliminate waiting times but redistributes the burden of waiting. Digital tools such as online appointment booking and teleconsultations compress delays and reduce coordination effort for users with sufficient digital skills, connectivity, and institutional trust. For others, limited digital literacy, material and accessibility constraints, language barriers, and reliance on intermediaries intensify uncertainty and prolonged time-to-care. Under capacity pressure, digital navigation becomes a key determinant of effective access, transforming waiting from a temporal delay into a socially stratified burden. These dynamics are particularly pronounced in mental healthcare and in rural settings. Discussion: In a near-universal healthcare system, digitalization operates as an access-governance mechanism rather than a neutral upgrade. By conditioning access on digital navigation capacities, digitalization produces stratified waiting trajectories despite formal universality of coverage. The pandemic exposed and accelerated these dynamics without resolving the underlying inequalities on which they rest. For UHC implementation, equity depends not only on coverage and financing, but on whether individuals can convert digital access pathways into timely care. Equity-sensitive digital transformation therefore requires multi-channel access, supported navigation, accessibility-by-design, and institutional capacity for mediation to prevent digitalization from amplifying health inequalities and undermining health service coverage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.