ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Association of marital status with affective temperament, education, occupation, and bonding style.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Marital status, such as marriage and divorce, is an important aspect of one's life and is associated with biopsychosocial and economic factors. The present study aimed to investigate the association of marital status with affective temperament, education, occupation, and bonding style. Methods: The dataset included 112 individuals consisting of 28 unmarried, 69 married, and 15 divorced individuals. First, demographic data, including age, gender, education, occupation, affective temperament, and bonding style, were compared among the three groups (unmarried, married, and divorced) using analysis of variance or χ Results: The proportion of full-time employees was significantly lower than that of homemakers in married participants compared with divorced participants, whereas neither education, affective temperament, nor parental bonding was significantly associated with marital status. Conclusion: The present findings suggest that the proportion of full-time employees may be significantly lower than that of homemakers in married participants compared with divorced participants. Further prospective studies are needed to clarify causality and additional contributing factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.