ArticleJRSM cardiovascular disease
Associations between anthropometric measures and cardiovascular risk biomarkers in women with short stature.
Article in JRSM cardiovascular disease. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The study aimed to investigate which anthropometric indicator are most associated with cardiovascular risk (CVR) in low-income women with short stature and to determine the cut-off point that best determined CVR. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted with meticulous attention to detail. We evaluated a comprehensive range of sociodemographic and anthropometric data, including body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio, waist-to-height ratio, and body adiposity index. Additionally, dietary and biochemical data such as glucose and lipid profile, ultrasensitive C-reactive protein (CRP), and blood pressure were assessed in 83 women. Body composition was measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Results: Approximately 85% had excess total body fat, 70% had low levels of high-density lipoprotein and increased levels of ultrasensitive CRP, 29.3% were hypercholesterolemic, and 13.4% were hypertensive. Multivariate logistic regression analyses indicated that BMI was the most associated factor of CVR (ultrasensitive CRP) (OR: 1.31, 95% CI: 1.10-1.56). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.64 for cholesterol (95% CI 0.517-0.766; p = 0.04) and 0.72 for ultrasensitive CRP (95% CI 0.601-0.840; p = 0.002). BMI cut-off points with the best balance of sensitivity and specificity were 24.0 kg/m Conclusion: BMI was the most associated factor of CVR in low-income women with short stature. The results indicate that more sensitive BMI cut-off points should be considered to detect CVR in this population group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.