ArticleACS measurement science au2026
Rapid Classification of Coffee Varieties Using Single-Bean Hot Gas Extraction Ion-Mobility Spectrometry with Machine Learning.
Article in ACS measurement science au, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Coffee is consumed by over one billion people daily, creating a high risk of adulteration where premium varieties are blended with inferior fillers. While various analytical techniques exist, they are often expensive and require labor-intensive sample preparation, such as grinding and brewing. Here, we present a proof-of-concept of a non-destructive platform that integrates ion-mobility spectrometry with online hot-gas extraction for rapid classification of coffee varieties using single-bean samples. The integration of a 1D convolutional neural network (CNN) model enables automated differentiation with 100% classification accuracy across four coffee bean varieties (Civet Arabica, Civet Robusta, carbonic maceration, and anaerobic fermentation natural) at an optimal bin width of 0.25 ms. When expanded to 10 diverse coffee bean varieties, the 1D CNN model achieved ∼92% independent test accuracy at a bin width of 0.10 ms. Furthermore, the system successfully monitored aroma degradation over 3 weeks and accurately predicted degradation patterns of anaerobic fermentation natural Arabica. Additionally, this 1D CNN model achieved 90% accuracy in predicting the presence of adulterants in coffee beans. Although the proposed method does not identify specific VOCs, the heuristic readouts it generates still enable rapid quality control and authenticity verification in commercial coffee beans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.