ArticleACS measurement science au2026
Voltammetric Translation with Transformers: Converting Cyclic Voltammograms to Differential Pulse Voltammograms.
Article in ACS measurement science au, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Here we report a voltammogram translation framework that converts cyclic voltammograms into differential pulse voltammograms, enabling protocol interoperability without requiring paired experimental corpora. We formulate CV → DPV conversion as a sequence-to-sequence regression problem and implement a query-based transformer that encodes the full CV cycle with explicit scan-direction context and decodes DPV on a fixed target potential grid via cross-attention. To overcome the scarcity of paired measurements, we generate a large synthetic paired CV-DPV data set using physics-informed simulations spanning six representative mechanisms (E, EC, ECatal, EE, ECE, and ECEC) and broad parameter variations. Across deep-learning and classical regression baselines, the Transformer achieves the lowest prediction error and markedly outperforms slope-based heuristics. Cross-attention analysis indicates a two-mode strategy: baseline anchoring away from faradaic features and protocol-consistent local retrieval in peak-forming regions, including an offset comparable to the DPV pulse amplitude. Importantly, the experimental validation directly probes mechanism coverage learned from simulation: the translator accurately reproduces DPV for
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.