ArticleThe journal of climate change and health
Linking precipitation-driven flooding events to acute respiratory illness in New York city.
Article in The journal of climate change and health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Human-induced climate change is increasing extreme precipitation events, potentially affecting respiratory health and healthcare access in urban areas. This study examined the relationship between precipitation-driven flooding events and emergency department (ED) visits for acute respiratory illnesses in New York City (NYC) communities. Methods: We conducted a retrospective ecological study across 14 postal ZIP codes in New York City's five boroughs from October 2020 to November 2022. Using NYC Micronet sensor network data, we analyzed ED visits for influenza-like illness and pneumonia (n=53,534), categorizing flooding events as minor (<1.5 inches), moderate (1.5-2.5 inches), or major (>2.5 inches). Associations between flooding exposure and ED visits were analyzed using Poisson mixed effects models with a 6-day lag, controlling for socioeconomic status and COVID-19 rates. Results: Precipitation-driven flooding was associated with an average 2.8% decrease in respiratory ED visits after 6 days (IRR 0.972, 95% CI 0.955-0.989). Minor flooding showed a 2.4% reduction in visits, while moderate and major flooding were associated with 17.9% and 12.9% reductions, respectively. These associations remained significant after controlling for confounders. Conclusions: Acute urban flooding events were associated with decreased respiratory ED visits, suggesting possible disruptions to healthcare access or deferred care. These findings affect climate change adaptation and infrastructure planning to ensure continued healthcare accessibility during extreme weather events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.