Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42326840›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cellular neuroscience2026

How do signals propagate in neuronal compartments? Insights from the Poisson-Nernst Planck model.

Paul Paragot, Stella Krell, Claire Guerrier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cellular neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Paul ParagotLaboratoire J.A. Dieudonné, CNRS UMR7351, Université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France.
Stella KrellLaboratoire J.A. Dieudonné, CNRS UMR7351, Université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France.
Claire GuerrierLaboratoire J.A. Dieudonné, CNRS UMR7351, Université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The emergence of novel experimental techniques such as dendritic patch-clamp recordings or genetically-encoded Ca2+-indicators have made the activity of the dendritic tree considerably more tractable, challenging the old postulate that dendrites serve mainly to connect neurons and to convey information with no specific role in synaptic plasticity. Hence, how the dendritic tree transforms synaptic input into neuronal output and defines the relationships between active synapses is now a leading question in neuroscience. To understand the specific role of dendrites, dendritic spines and dendritic tree geometry in shaping neuronal signal, a crucial first step is to understand precisely voltage and ionic dynamics in such small neuronal compartments. For this purpose, we use the Poisson-Nernst-Planck (PNP) model, which is the recognized standard for modeling voltage dynamics and ionic electrodiffusion in electrolytes at the scale now reached by experimental techniques. This non-linear model presents significant challenges for both modeling and simulation due to its high concentration gradients and sensitivity to boundary conditions, making it difficult to simulate on complex geometries. We resolve these issues here by using a state-of-the-art finite volume method, the Discrete-Duality Finite Volume method, which we previously developed to simulate the PNP system of equations on various two-dimensional geometries representing neuronal compartments. Using this method, we investigate the propagation and attenuation of an ionic influx coming from a synapse near a dendritic branch bifurcation and at a dendritic spine, as well as signal invasion in the nearby branches and spines. By connecting these compartments to an ionic reservoir representing the dendritic shaft, we observe that the distance to the shaft strongly influences signal propagation. Notably, a spine positioned close to a large branch behaves as an isolated compartment, while a distant spine is susceptible to signal invasion. Our numerical results therefore suggest that the local geometry of the dendritic tree has a major influence on spine behavior. Consequently, this study proposes that signal integration rules would differ depending on the location of the spine on the dendritic tree. This means that modifications to neuronal structure and organization following activity are not limited to the spine morphology but depend on the entire dendritic tree architecture.

Indexed as

dendritic integrationfinite volume methodneuronal plasticityPoisson-Nernst-Planck modelsignal integration

Identifiers

PMID42326840
PMCPMC13278984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.