ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2026
Neural basis of successful DBS for OCD after failed capsulotomy.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is characterized by disturbing thoughts (obsessions) that initiate anxiety-reducing thoughts or behaviors (compulsions). For patients with treatment-resistant OCD (tr-OCD), neuromodulation techniques, like capsulotomy (a lesion in the anterior limb of the internal capsule) and deep brain stimulation (DBS), have emerged as interventions that likely regulate connectivity between the prefrontal cortex (PFC) and subcortical targets. Three patients (Cap-DBS1-3) underwent a failed capsulotomy followed by successful DBS. Here, we aimed to understand the brain connections disrupted by failed capsulotomy vs modulated by successful DBS. Methods: We used diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI) tractography in a control cohort with tr-OCD (n=12) and in two of the Cap-DBS patients themselves to determine connectivity profiles of the capsulotomy, volume of tissue activated (VTA), and potentially necessary tracts (VTA minus capsulotomy tracts). We used whole-brain, PFC-focused, and subcortically-focused tractography algorithms to fully explore the space of possible connections. Results: Capsulotomy regions-of-interest (ROIs) connected with a variety of PFC and subcortical regions. VTA ROIs and potentially necessary tracts had limited and inconsistent PFC connectivity but substantial subcortical connectivity. While correlated to the average OCD connectome (r = 0.214, 95% CI [0.177, 0.251]; r = 0.756, 95% CI [0.739, 0.772]), the Cap-DBS connectomes had many edges that were stronger (z-score > 3). Conclusions: The connectivity profile of potentially necessary tracts for successful DBS treatment after failed capsulotomy revealed a surprising proportion of subcortical regions and inconsistent PFC involvement, highlighting an often-ignored set of connections that may be critical to effective DBS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.