ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2026
Referral Pattern Changes Over a Decade in a Tertiary Neuro-Ophthalmology Clinic.
Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinical Spectrum of Neuro-Ophthalmic Disorders at a Thai Tertiary Referral Center: An 11-Year Retrospective Study.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate changes in referral patterns, including referral sources, patient demographics, and diagnostic patterns to a neuro-ophthalmology unit in a single tertiary medical center across two distinct three-year periods, a decade apart. Methods: A retrospective database analysis of patients seen for their initial visit in the NO Unit at a tertiary Medical Center in Israel during January 1 Results: Patients in Group 2 were significantly older than those in Group 1 (p < 0.024). There was a significant increase in referrals from ophthalmologists (p < 0.001) and pediatricians (p < 0.001), while referrals from neurologists (p < 0.006) and rehabilitation specialists (p < 0.003) declined, Diagnoses related to vision changes increased significantly over time (p <0.001). Diagnoses related to complaint of diplopia were more frequent in Group 2 (p < 0.01). A multinomial logistic regression further demonstrated that, after adjusting for age and sex, diagnoses of pseudotumor cerebri (PTC) (OR = 1.46, p = 0.004) and tumor/compressive lesions (OR = 1.55, p < 0.001) were significantly more likely in Group 2 compared with Group 1, whereas optic nerve disease, ocular motility disorders, and visual function complaints showed no significant temporal change. Conclusion: The study demonstrated an increase in referrals to NO services and a demographic shift toward older patient population. These findings emphasize the growing need for neuro-ophthalmologic expertise, particularly in the context of an aging population. Multinomial regression further showed that diagnoses of PTC and tumor/compressive lesions became significantly more common over the decade, highlighting evolving diagnostic trends that may inform resource allocation and future service planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.