ArticleACS omega2026
Comparative Study between Cryogel and Hydrogel-Based Chitosan: Relationship between Structure, Swelling Ability, and Cu(II) Adsorption Ability.
Article in ACS omega, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Polysaccharide based biomaterials for advanced wound healing applications.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chitosan-based materials are widely known for their ability to adsorb heavy metals. However, the role of their internal porous structure in controlling the adsorption performance remains unclear. In this study, chitosan/star-shaped polycaprolactone (CS/stPCL) cryogels and hydrogels were synthesized using the same urethane/urea cross-linking chemistry, allowing the effect of the fabrication method and internal structure to be directly compared. Scanning electron microscopy revealed that the cryogel had a highly interconnected macroporous network, whereas the hydrogel had thick pore walls. These structural differences strongly affected the material performance. The cryogel exhibited a higher equilibrium swelling ratio and better Cu-(II) removal efficiency, owing to its open, accessible pore structure, which facilitated Cu-(II) transfer. In contrast, the hydrogel showed faster initial swelling but a lower final swelling ratio because its pore walls were thicker. Although Cu-(II) adsorption in both materials followed a physisorption mechanism, their kinetic and isotherm behaviors were clearly different. This finding highlights that the pore structure is as important as chemical composition in designing effective adsorbents. In addition, both materials were biodegradable in soil, which supported their potential as sustainable materials for environmental remediation.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.