ArticleOpen research Africa2026
Addressing supply side constraints for digital work creation: A Concurrent Embedded Mixed Method Study in Kenya.
Article in Open research Africa, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Addressing supply side constraints for digital work creation: A Concurrent Embedded Mixed Method Study in Kenya.Open research Africa · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This paper addresses a pathway for addressing high unemployment among educated and skilled youth. The supply-side constraints limiting participation in dignified digital work remain underexplored. The aim was to examine how access to infrastructure, training and mentorship, and awareness creation influence engagement in digital work, and how demographic factors moderate these relationships. Methods: A mixed-methods concurrent design was used, combining quantitative data from a cross-sectional survey with qualitative insights gathered through focus group discussions (FGDs) and key informant interviews (KIIs). Results: Findings indicate variations in awareness of digital work, training and mentorship access, infrastructure access, and engagement across all demographic categories. Gender showed a negative correlation with infrastructure access and awareness but did not significantly relate to training and mentorship or engagement. Region, setting, age, education, and occupation all significantly correlated with digital work engagement and access levels. Moderation analysis revealed that demographic factors except gender and occupation strengthened the relationship between infrastructure access and engagement in digital work. Only regional diversity enhanced the relationship between training/mentorship and engagement, indicating generally equitable access across other demographic groups. Awareness levels and engagement were strengthened by region, setting, age, occupation, and education, but not by gender, demonstrating balanced gender influence. Overall, training and mentorship programs exhibited the most balanced implementation across demographics, while gender mainstreaming efforts appear to be yielding positive outcomes. Conclusions: The study found that work initiatives must integrate demographic considerations into the design of infrastructure, training, mentorship, and awareness programs. It make contribution by providing new evidence to guide policymakers in developing targeted interventions that expand dignified digital work opportunities as a strategy for reducing unemployment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.