Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42326606›Full record

ArticleJournal of hepatocellular carcinoma2026

Development and Validation of a Machine Learning-Based Individualized Model to Predict TKI Benefit in Postoperative Recurrent HCC.

Meng Li, Yumin Jiang, Lin Gong, Ruitao Sun, Aoyun Hao, Kun Liu, Kunye Luan, Zheng Jia, Shimei Zhang, Kui Liu and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Meng LiDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0009-0004-7246-2965
Yumin JiangDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, People's Republic of China.
Lin GongDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, No. 971 Hospital of the People's Liberation Army Navy, Qingdao, Shandong, People's Republic of China.
Ruitao SunDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, People's Republic of China.
Aoyun HaoDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, People's Republic of China.
Kun LiuDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, No. 971 Hospital of the People's Liberation Army Navy, Qingdao, Shandong, People's Republic of China.
Kunye LuanDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, No. 971 Hospital of the People's Liberation Army Navy, Qingdao, Shandong, People's Republic of China.
Zheng JiaDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, People's Republic of China.
Shimei ZhangDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, People's Republic of China.
Kui LiuDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, People's Republic of China.
Bin TanDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, People's Republic of China.
Weiyu HuDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, People's Republic of China.
Chao QuDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, People's Republic of China.
Jingyu CaoDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Postoperative recurrence is a major contributor to poor prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after curative resection. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are commonly used for recurrent HCC, yet substantial interpatient heterogeneity limits their universal benefit, and reliable tools to individualize post-recurrence therapy are lacking. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 454 patients with recurrent HCC following curative resection. Overlap weighting based on propensity scores was applied to balance baseline characteristics between TKI-treated and non-TKI-treated groups and to assess the survival benefit of TKI therapy. Machine learning-based survival models were independently developed for each treatment cohort using multiple algorithms and internally validated. A counterfactual inference framework was implemented to estimate individualized survival outcomes under alternative treatment strategies and to identify the optimal therapy for each patient. Results: After overlap weighting, TKI therapy was associated with improved survival compared with non-TKI treatment, including longer recurrence-free survival (median, 24 vs. 12 months; HR = 0.355, Conclusion: TKI therapy provides significant survival benefit in recurrent HCC after curative resection. Our machine learning-based, counterfactual framework enables individualized estimation of treatment benefit, supporting personalized post-recurrence therapy and facilitating precision management in this high-risk population.

Indexed as

counterfactual reasoninghepatocellular carcinomamachine learningpostoperative recurrencetyrosine kinase inhibitor

Identifiers

PMID42326606
PMCPMC13282989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.