ArticleArchives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation2026
Transitioning Towards Quality-of-Care Assessment in Orthotics and Prosthetics Practice.
Article in Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Quality of care is fundamental for achieving optimal patient outcomes, enhancing patient experiences, and engaging in improvement practices. Quality of care comprises 6 domains: safety, effectiveness, patient-centeredness, timeliness, efficiency, and equity. Despite robust frameworks guiding quality measurement in other health care fields, orthotics and prosthetics (O&P) rehabilitation lags in adopting these practices. As quality-of-care measures become more prevalent, particularly as the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services plans to shift to value-based care by 2030, the urgency to establish measures in O&P increases. Establishing specific evidence-based quality measures in O&P empowers the profession to define appropriate standards, helping to ensure that care remains tailored to patients' needs and produces optimal outcomes-while minimizing the risk of inappropriate, externally imposed benchmarks. Several key groups across the care continuum are highlighted in this article, because they will be responsible for transitioning toward quality-of-care assessment in O&P care: leaders in O&P organizations, researchers, manufacturers, clinic owners, clinicians, patients, and educators. When each group fulfills its responsibilities, it strengthens overall quality and enhances the value of care provided. This special communication highlights the imperative of incorporating quality-of-care measurement into O&P practice across each key group and calls for research to define meaningful measures, establish standardized indicators, and implement systems for quality improvement. This article provides a comprehensive perspective to inform and educate each key group in quality-of-care concepts to foster improvement efforts in O&P.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.