ArticleArchives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation2026
Quantification of Lower Extremity Dressing Movements in Patients With Stroke.
Article in Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To quantify movement characteristics of lower extremity dressing among patients with stroke. Design: Retrospective study. Setting: Rehabilitation hospital. Participants: This study included 49 patients with stroke and hemiplegia. They were classified by toileting scores of the Functional Independence Measure: independent group (14 men, 4 women; n=18), supervision group (13 men, 3 women; n=16), and assistance group (11 men, 4 women; n=15). Interventions: None. Main Outcome Measures: The lower garment raising movement was measured using a 3-dimensional motion analysis system. Forty-three reflective markers were attached, and the movement was divided into 5 phases based on hand-marker trajectories. Trunk and pelvic angles, center-of-pressure range, paretic limb loading ratio, manipulation time, and vertical displacement of the lower garment were calculated. Results: The supervision group had longer manipulation times than the independent group during the downward reach (2.08s vs 1.29s, Conclusions: In the supervision group, decreased efficiency was noted during the downward reach and initial manipulations. In the assistance group, participants performed downward reach and the final manipulations in a posture that limited hand access to the lower garment, resulting in inefficient movements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.