Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42326579›Full record

ArticleArchives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation2026

Impact of a Therapeutic Dance Program Compared With Circuit Physiotherapy in Rehabilitation of Older People With Recent Acquired Brain Injury: A Randomized Controlled Feasibility Trial With Embedded Qualitative Assessment.

Zoe Adey-Wakeling, Heather Block, Selena Hutchins, Leanne Greene, Maayken Van Den Berg, Garry Stewart, Enwu Liu, Wendy Shulver, Maria Crotty, Susan Hillier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Zoe Adey-WakelingDivision of Rehabilitation, Aged and Palliative Care, Southern Adelaide Local Health Network, Adelaide, South Australia.
Heather BlockDivision of Rehabilitation, Aged and Palliative Care, Southern Adelaide Local Health Network, Adelaide, South Australia.
Selena HutchinsDivision of Rehabilitation, Aged and Palliative Care, Southern Adelaide Local Health Network, Adelaide, South Australia.
Leanne GreeneFlinders Health and Medical Research Institute, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia.
Maayken Van Den BergCaring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia.
Garry StewartCollege of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia.
Enwu LiuFlinders Health and Medical Research Institute, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia.
Wendy ShulverFlinders Health and Medical Research Institute, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia.
Maria CrottyDivision of Rehabilitation, Aged and Palliative Care, Southern Adelaide Local Health Network, Adelaide, South Australia.
Susan HillierAllied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To assess the feasibility of providing dance groups to people with recent acquired brain injuries (ABIs) in a hospital rehabilitation outpatient setting. Design: A mixed methods exploratory trial that included qualitative interviews and a single blind randomized controlled trial comparing 10 weeks (3 per wk: 30 sessions) of dance group to circuit group. Setting: A day rehabilitation outpatient setting in a tertiary hospital in South Australia. Participants: A total of 49 participants (N=49) with ABI consented and were randomly divided. Interventions: Patients were randomly divided to a 10-week program of either dance group (n=25) or physiotherapy circuit group (n=24). The intervention was completed by 84% of dance participants and 87% of physiotherapy circuit group participants. Main Outcome Measures: Primary outcome measure was health-related quality of life measured with Short Form-36. Secondary outcomes included a battery of assessments of balance, function, mobility, mood, and cognition. Feasibility outcomes included information on enrolment rates, attendance, participant satisfaction, and adverse events. Results: Physical outcomes were comparable between the 2 groups (with no adverse outcomes), but gains in the mental health component of quality of life measures were observed in the dance group only, including energy/fatigue and emotional well-being. Qualitative results indicated that participants found both dance and circuit groups enjoyable and acceptable. Participants offered that dance had complemented other aspects of their rehabilitation. Conclusions: Dance groups in rehabilitation outpatient settings appear a safe, feasible therapeutic option post ABI, with significant gains in health-related quality of life, mood, and fatigue measures. Findings support feasibility to progress to a larger cluster randomized controlled trial to assess cost effectiveness and implementation issues in rehabilitation services generally.

Indexed as

3-5 danceBrain injuryFeasibility studiesRandomized controlled trialRehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID42326579
PMCPMC13282758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.