Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42326576›Full record

ReviewArchives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation2026

Exploring the Feasibility and Patient Acceptance of RAGT for Overground Ambulation in Adults With Guillain-Barré Syndrome: A Scoping Review.

Joon Sin Ser, Siew Kwaon Lui

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Joon Sin SerRehabilitation Medicine, Singhealth Residency, Singapore.
Siew Kwaon LuiDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To review the current literature on the feasibility as well as weaknesses and strengths of robot-assisted gait training (RAGT) in the rehabilitation of gait in adult patients with Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS). Data Sources: This scoping review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis for Scoping Reviews guidelines. A systematic search between November 2024 and May 2025 of PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH) Grey Matters, and citation mining was performed to evaluate for relevant studies. Study Selection: All studies involving the use of RAGT in adults (≥18y) diagnosed with acute inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy or GBS were included. Eligible study designs comprised case reports, case series, feasibility studies, and randomized controlled trials. The search yielded 11 potentially relevant articles. Data Extraction: Study selection was conducted in 2 stages: title and abstract screening followed by full-text review. Discrepancies between the 2 independent reviewers were resolved through discussion until consensus was achieved. Data Synthesis: Four studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising 2 case reports, 1 mixed-methods feasibility study, and 1 cross-sectional study, with a total of 19 participants. Across studies, RAGT was generally reported to be feasible, well tolerated, and acceptable to patients, with no major safety concerns. Reported benefits included the ability to initiate overground ambulation, high-intensity repetitive gait practice, and reduced physical burden on therapists. Patient acceptance was supported by positive user experiences, adherence to training sessions, and completion of prescribed protocols, although outcome measures and reporting were inconsistent. Conclusions: The current evidence base for RAGT in adults with GBS is limited but suggests that it is a feasible and acceptable adjunct to conventional rehabilitation. Although functional improvements were reported, conclusions regarding effectiveness remain constrained by small sample sizes and study heterogeneity. Further prospective and methodologically robust studies are needed to better characterize feasibility, patient experience, and implementation considerations of RAGT in this population.

Indexed as

AmbulationGBSRAGTRehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID42326576
PMCPMC13282811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.