Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42326571›Full record

ReviewArchives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation2026

Assessing Inpatient Rehabilitation Outcomes for Pediatric Dysphagia with the PEDI-EAT-10.

Sarah Sung, Julia Carpenter, Jungwha Lee, Leora R Cherney

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sarah SungShirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, IL.
Julia CarpenterShirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, IL.
Jungwha LeeBiostatistics and Informatics, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL.
Leora R CherneyShirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, IL.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To determine if the Pediatric Assessment Eating Tool (PEDI-EAT-10), a parent- or caregiver-reported measure that describes the impact of swallowing problems on daily life, is sensitive to change in feeding and swallowing impairments in inpatient rehabilitation pediatric patients with an acquired neurologic etiology. Design: Quality improvement study measuring pre to post-treatment change in the PEDI-EAT-10. Setting: This study was conducted on the pediatric inpatient floor at a large urban rehabilitation hospital. Participants: Caregivers of inpatient pediatric patients with acquired neurologic disorders (n=23, age from 2y, 10mo to 17y, 6mo) completed the PEDI-EAT-10 at admission and discharge. Interventions: Patients were provided usual standard of clinical care. Main Outcome Measures: Change scores in PEDI-EAT-10 from admission to discharge and associations between PEDI-EAT-10 at admission/discharge with diet and oral intake measures (Functional Oral Intake Scale [FOIS], International Dysphagia Diet Standardization Initiative [IDDSI] Scale) as well as Penetration Aspiration Scale scores obtained during videofluoroscopy were assessed. Results: Participants showed a significant improvement in PEDI-EAT-10 scores from admission to discharge (mean change=6.96, SD=10.99, Conclusions: The PEDI-EAT-10 can detect change in an acquired neurologic inpatient pediatric population and may be used to measure outcome of dysphagia rehabilitation in this clinical setting. Given its brevity, inclusion of the PEDI-EAT-10 in routine clinical practice has the potential to offer a quick and precise method of capturing dysphagia outcomes.

Indexed as

DysphagiaInpatientsOutcome assessmentPediatricsRehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID42326571
PMCPMC13282806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.