ReviewArchives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation2026
Effectiveness of Telerehabilitation in the Treatment of Shoulder Injuries: A Systematic Review of Randomized Clinical Trials.
Review in Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To critically analyze evidence on the effectiveness of telerehabilitation in the treatment of shoulder injuries through a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Data Sources: A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and LILACS databases, covering studies published from 2019 to 2024. Study Selection: Studies were included if they were randomized controlled trials, published in English or Spanish, and focused on telerehabilitation interventions targeting shoulder injuries with outcomes related to pain and/or function. Data Extraction: Two reviewers independently selected and extracted data on study characteristics, participant demographics, intervention protocols, and reported outcomes. Disagreements were resolved by a third reviewer. Data Synthesis: Five studies involving 196 participants were included. Interventions varied in duration, frequency, and technological platforms. Most studies reported improvements in pain and function comparable to those achieved with in-person therapy, with high adherence and satisfaction rates. Conclusions: Telerehabilitation is a promising approach for managing shoulder injuries, providing effective, accessible, and personalized care. However, standardization of protocols and further research on complex pathologies are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.