Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42326449›Full record

ArticleDigital journal of ophthalmology : DJO2026

Ophthalmology journal article processing charges for publications in a post-COVID world.

Kush Savsani, Vishnupriya Alavala, Nikisha Richards, Surbhi Bansal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital journal of ophthalmology : DJO, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kush SavsaniDepartment of Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia.
Vishnupriya AlavalaCollege of Humanities and Sciences, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia.
Nikisha RichardsDepartment of Ophthalmology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia.
Surbhi BansalDepartment of Ophthalmology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The period 2002-2021 saw an annual growth rate of 51.46% in listings of open access (OA) journals in the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ), with a steeper rate of growth corresponding with the onset of COVID-19. The introduction of OA and hybrid models, which give authors traditional subscription and OA options, may have led to increased article processing charges (APCs). This study aimed to analyze the APCs for ophthalmology journal articles after the COVID pandemic and analyze changes in publication modality and cost. Methods: APC, frequency of publication, and impact factor (IF) were analyzed for 83 MEDLINE-indexed ophthalmology journals. Data were stratified based on publication modality (OA, hybrid, or traditional), and geodistribution, intermodality, and correlation between APC and IF were compared. Results: Average APC for OA, hybrid, and traditional journals was $1,310.49, $3,550.71, and $7.18, respectively ( Conclusions: Ophthalmology journals are experiencing a subject-wide transition from traditional publication to hybrid modality. Since the COVID pandemic, APCs across all publication modes have increased, and there has been a transition from the traditional publishing model to a more lucrative hybrid model.

Indexed as

COVID-19OphthalmologyPandemicsPeriodicals as TopicPublishingHumansJournal Impact FactorSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID42326449
PMCPMC13282140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.