ArticleJSES reviews, reports, and techniques2026
Geographic retention and gender-based trends among orthopedic shoulder and elbow surgeons in the United States.
Article in JSES reviews, reports, and techniques, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Regional variations in surgical training may influence where physicians establish clinical practice. In the competitive field of shoulder and elbow surgery, the impact of training location on practice patterns remains unclear. As shoulder arthroplasty volumes continue to rise and rotator cuff disease remains a common musculoskeletal complaint among older patients, equitable access to trained shoulder specialists is paramount. A deeper understanding of these trends may help identify regions that better train and retain subspecialists and inform strategies to improve geographic and gender representation. Methods: This study included shoulder and elbow surgeons identified through the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons database. Training and practice locations-medical school, residency, fellowship, and current employment were categorized using U.S. Census regions (Northeast, South, Midwest, West, international). Residency programs were also ranked according to the top 25 orthopedic hospitals listed in U.S. News & World Report. Publicly available sources were used to collect demographic and professional data. Descriptive statistics and chi-square analyses assessed geographic retention, and subgroup analyses evaluated differences by gender. Results: A total of 752 shoulder and elbow surgeons were identified: 50 (6.6%) were female and 702 (93.4%) were male. Surgeons were significantly more likely to practice in the same region where they completed residency (range: 44.1%-77.0%, Conclusion: Geographic retention among shoulder and elbow surgeons was highest following residency and medical school and lowest after fellowship, where retention varied widely by region. The Northeast consistently demonstrated the highest retention across training stages, whereas the Midwest had the lowest retention after fellowship. Sex-based differences were also observed, with greater retention of female surgeons in the Northeast after fellowship and no female retention in the Midwest after residency. These findings highlight consistent regional and sex-based differences in geographic retention across training stages.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.