Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42326420›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in microbiology2026

Bacteriophage therapy against multidrug resistant bacterial infections demonstrates clinical advances and engineering innovations between 2020-2026.

Ahmed J Alzahrani

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. UropathogenicAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Beyond Resistance Genes:Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ahmed J AlzahraniCollege of Medicine, Al-Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The global crisis of antimicrobial resistance has reached critical levels, with multi-drug resistant (MDR) bacterial pathogens threatening to render conventional antibiotics ineffective. This mini review synthesizes recent evidence from 2020 to 2026 on bacteriophage therapy against MDR bacteria, examining clinical applications, engineering advances, mechanistic insights, and emerging technologies. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted across Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases, supplemented by PubMed, Google Scholar, and ArXiv searches, focusing on phage therapy for MDR bacterial infections published between 2020 and 2026. Results: Recent developments include expanded clinical experience through specialized phage centers, sophisticated genetic engineering techniques including CRISPR-based systems, successful compassionate-use programs, and innovative combination therapies with antibiotics. Clinical reports demonstrate safety and preliminary efficacy signals in selected refractory infections, though randomized controlled data remain limited. Engineering advances have produced phage-delivered CRISPR antimicrobials, hybrid delivery platforms, and synthetic phage particles that expand therapeutic capabilities. Conclusion: While challenges remain in regulatory standardization, scalable manufacturing, and resistance management, the field has demonstrated significant progress toward clinical translation. The convergence of synthetic biology, personalized medicine approaches, and growing clinical evidence positions phage therapy as a viable complementary strategy in the fight against MDR bacterial infections.

Indexed as

antimicrobial resistancebacteriophage therapycombination therapyCRISPR-Cas systemsmulti-drug resistancephage engineering

Identifiers

PMID42326420
PMCPMC13279744

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.