SynthesisFrontiers in urology2026
Hysterectomy and the risk of urinary incontinence: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Object: To evaluate the association between hysterectomy and the risk of developing urinary incontinence (UI) based on observational studies. Methods: We conducted a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library for observational studies from inception to December 14, 2025, using medical subject headings (MeSH) and keywords. The risk of bias and the quality of evidence were assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS), the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) criteria, and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system, respectively. To derive overall summary estimates of odds ratios (OR), a random-effects meta-analysis was performed, complemented by subgroup analyses to explore potential effect modifiers. And the presence of publication bias was evaluated through funnel plots and Egger's regression test. Results: This meta-analysis is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024587774) and follows PRISMA guidelines, including 12 studies with a cumulative total of 146,759 individuals who underwent hysterectomy. The pooled analysis revealed a significant association between hysterectomy and an increased risk of UI, yielding an OR of 1.31, (95% CI: 1.03-1.66, I Conclusion: Hysterectomy is associated with an increased risk of urinary incontinence, based on synthesized evidence from observational studies. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42024587774.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.