Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42326389›Full record

ArticleTransplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation2026

Establishing standards for controlled donation after circulatory determination of death in adults: the Bucharest international European Society for Organ Transplantation consensus.

Helen Opdam, Alicia Pérez-Blanco, Dale Gardiner, Richard Hasz, Nichon Esther Jansen, Matthieu Le Dorze, Alberto Sandiumenge, Giuliano Testa, Shih-Ning Then, Marinella Zanierato and 4 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Potential for donation after circulatory death in Germany: a multicenter retrospective study at seven university hospitals.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Helen OpdamDepartment of Intensive Care, Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia.
Alicia Pérez-BlancoOrganizacion Nacional de Trasplantes, Madrid, Spain.
Dale GardinerOrgan and Tissue Donation and Transplantation, NHS Blood and Transplant, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Richard HaszGift of Life Donor Program, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Nichon Esther JansenDepartment of Policy and Research, Dutch Transplant Foundation, Leiden, Netherlands.
Matthieu Le DorzeDepartment of Anesthesia and Critical Care, AP-HP, Hôpital Lariboisière, Paris, France.
Alberto SandiumengeVall d'Hebron Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain.
Giuliano TestaSimmons Transplant Institute, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States.
Shih-Ning ThenAustralian Centre for Health Law Research, Faculty of Business & Law, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Marinella ZanieratoDepartment of Anesthesia and Critical Care, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy.
Beatriz Domínguez-GilOrganizacion Nacional de Trasplantes, Madrid, Spain.
Gabriel C OniscuDivision of Transplantation Surgery, CLINTEC, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Umberto CilloUnità di Chirurgia Epatobiliare e Trapianto Epatico, Università degli Studi di Padova, Padova, Italy.
Dominique E MartinSchool of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Controlled donation after circulatory determination of death (cDCDD) is increasingly vital to expanding deceased organ donation globally, yet variability exists in clinical, legal, and ethical practices. This study utilized a Delphi consensus process involving 37 international experts to develop recommendations to guide the development and operation of adult cDCDD programs. Two survey rounds evaluated agreement on system requirements, donor identification, medical suitability, communication, end-of-life care, and ante-mortem interventions. Consensus was achieved on numerous recommendations emphasizing the need for robust legal frameworks distinct from end-of-life care decisions, multidisciplinary approaches for donor suitability assessment, and clear, sensitive communication led by trained donation professionals. Ensuring patient comfort and dignity during withdrawal of life-sustaining measures, alongside optimizing donation outcomes, was prioritized. Use of ante-mortem interventions was deemed to require careful balancing of benefits and burdens in line with patient and family preferences. The findings highlight international variability and underscore the importance of tailored protocols, education, and further research to establish an evidence base for ante-mortem interventions and improve clinical prediction of donation feasibility. These consensus recommendations aim to advance ethical, effective, and sustainable adult cDCDD programs worldwide.

Indexed as

DeathOrgan TransplantationTissue and Organ ProcurementAdultDelphi TechniqueEuropeHumansTerminal CareTissue DonorsconsensusDCD (donation after circulatory death)deceased donationdonationtransplantation

Identifiers

PMID42326389
PMCPMC13276612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.