SynthesisFrontiers in genetics2026
Diagnostic yield of long-read sequencing for rare diseases: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Frontiers in genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Nearly half of patients with rare genetic disorders remain undiagnosed, which may in part be due to limitations of current short-read sequencing (SRS) approaches in detecting complex genomic alterations. Long-read whole genome sequencing (lrWGS) technologies can address these limitations through enhanced detection of structural variants (SVs), repetitive regions, and epigenetic changes. Methods: To evaluate the diagnostic yield of lrWGS in patients with rare genetic diseases receiving inconclusive or negative results from standard testing, we searched the PubMed, Science Direct, Scopus, and ProQuest databases to July 2025 for studies applying lrWGS to unresolved rare disease cases and reporting diagnostic outcomes. Risk of bias was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. Results: Nine studies involving 646 previously unresolved cases that underwent lrWGS met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 29 individuals (24 unique diagnoses involving 25 genes) received a definitive diagnosis through lrWGS, a diagnostic yield of 4.5%. SVs accounted for the majority of identified variants (41.67%), followed by combined SV/single-nucleotide variants (20.83%), methylation changes (16.67%), and other variant types (copy number variations, indels, and tandem repeats). Most detected variants were in regions typically inaccessible to short-read whole-exome sequencing (WES). lrWGS also enabled phasing and methylation analysis in a single assay, which was valuable for compound-heterozygosity detection and diagnostic interpretation. Conclusion: lrWGS shows clear potential for improving diagnostic rates in previously unresolved rare disease cases, particularly when applied after WES and combined with advanced tools such as phasing and methylation profiling. As technologies evolve and become more accessible, lrWGS may increasingly become a first-tier diagnostic approach, especially in phenotypically complex conditions. Systematic Review Registration: https://osf.io/y5azb/overview, identifier 10.17605/OSF.IO/Y5AZB.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.