ArticleEClinicalMedicine2026
Prognostic value of the Duke Activity Status Index for preoperative cardiac risk stratification: an international pooled cohort study.
Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Guidelines recommend structured self-reported functional capacity assessment for preoperative cardiac risk stratification, including the Duke Activity Status Index (DASI). However, evidence supporting its incremental prognostic value beyond established risk factors remains limited. We evaluated the prognostic performance of the DASI using pooled data from two prospective cohorts. Methods: We conducted a pooled cohort analysis of adults undergoing elective major non-cardiac surgery enrolled in the Measurement of Exercise Tolerance before Surgery (METS) and Functional Improvement Trajectories After Surgery (FIT After Surgery) studies, including data collected between March 2013 and April 2023. Before surgery, participants completed the Duke Activity Status Index (DASI), a structured 12-item questionnaire based on daily physical activities, and underwent routine preoperative biomarker measurement. The primary outcome was 30-day major cardiac complications (myocardial infarction or non-fatal cardiac arrest) or death. The secondary outcome was all-cause major complications. Hierarchical logistic regression assessed the incremental prognostic value of the DASI beyond age, Revised Cardiac Risk Index (RCRI), and natriuretic peptide concentration. Prognostic performance was evaluated using the likelihood ratio test (LRT), fraction of new predictive information, net reclassification improvement, c-index, calibration plots, and decision curve analysis. Findings: Among 3485 patients, 3.6% (n = 126) experienced the primary outcome and 19% (n = 647) experienced the secondary outcome. The DASI provided prognostic information beyond age, RCRI, and natriuretic peptide concentration for the primary outcome (LRT p = 0.009), and beyond age, sex, and surgery type for the secondary outcome (LRT p < 0.001). Inclusion of the DASI improved prognostic performance across multiple metrics, but overall discrimination of the final models remained modest (c-index 0.70-0.71), with limited net clinical benefit. Predicted risk associated with a given DASI score varied substantially by age, RCRI, and natriuretic peptide concentration, supporting interpretation of the DASI as a continuous prognostic marker rather than a dichotomous screening test. Interpretation: The DASI provides incremental prognostic information for preoperative cardiac risk assessment beyond guideline-recommended predictors. Its prognostic implications are modest, context-dependent, and best interpreted as a continuous prognostic marker alongside established risk factors, rather than as a stand-alone threshold-based tool. Funding: Canadian Institutes of Health Research; PSI Foundation; and the Elizabeth A. and Richard J. Currie, O.C. Chair in Translational Anesthesia Research at St. Michael's Hospital and the University of Toronto; The Ottawa Hospital Academic Medical Organization Innovation Fund; Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada; Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care; Ontario Ministry of Research, Innovation and Science; UK National Institute of Academic Anaesthesia; UK Clinical Research Collaboration; Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists; Monash University.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.