ArticleEClinicalMedicine2026
Physiotherapy and optimised enteral nutrition in the post-acute phase of critical illness (PHOENIX): a randomised controlled feasibility trial.
Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06159868 (Physiotherapy and Optimised Enteral Nutrition In the Post-acute Phase of Critical Illness), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Physiotherapy and Optimised Enteral Nutrition In the Post-acute Phase of Critical Illness (PHOENIX): A Randomised Controlled Feasibility Trial
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rehabilitation and the post-intensive care syndrome across the recovery continuum: a narrative review.Intensive care medicine · 2026Review
- Review
- Patient and clinician acceptability of an integrated physiotherapy and nutrition intervention after ICU discharge: a qualitative exploration of a pre-specified co-primary feasibility outcome of the PHOENIX trial.EClinicalMedicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Survivors of critical illness commonly experience prolonged physical and functional impairment related to muscle wasting, catabolism, and malnutrition. Rehabilitation and nutritional support beyond the intensive care unit (ICU) are frequently inconsistent, and deficits persist following ICU discharge. Although combined rehabilitation and nutritional interventions may support recovery, their feasibility in the post-ICU hospital setting is uncertain. Methods: PHOENIX was a mixed-methods, parallel group, open-label randomised controlled feasibility trial conducted in two United Kingdom university hospitals. Adult ICU survivors who had received four or more days of advanced respiratory support and with ongoing physiotherapy and dietetic rehabilitation needs at ICU discharge were recruited. Participants were randomly allocated to either an ICU-initiated, enhanced physiotherapy and optimised nutrition intervention or usual care. Primary feasibility outcomes were recruitment rate, retention at 30 days, and intervention fidelity. Secondary outcomes, collected to inform a future definitive trial, included days alive and out of hospital at 30 days (DAOH30), physical function, nutritional status, and quality of life. The trial was prospectively registered (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06159868). Findings: Between May 2024 and January 2025, 172 patients were screened, of whom 60 met eligibility criteria and all consented to participate. Recruitment targets were achieved within eight months, and retention at 30 days was 100%. Enhanced physiotherapy was delivered on 81% of available days, exceeding the predefined feasibility threshold of 70%. Delivery of prescribed nutritional targets was feasible, with intake fidelity exceeding progression criteria for both calories (75.2%) and protein (83.7%). Interpretation: A combined enhanced physiotherapy and optimised nutrition intervention following ICU discharge is feasible, with high recruitment, retention, and intervention fidelity. A definitive multicentre randomised controlled trial is now warranted to evaluate clinical and cost-effectiveness. Funding: This project is funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) under its Research for Patient Benefit (RfPB) Programme (Grant Reference Number NIHR205370).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.