Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42326381›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2026

Physiotherapy and optimised enteral nutrition in the post-acute phase of critical illness (PHOENIX): a randomised controlled feasibility trial.

David McWilliams, Owen Gustafson, Nicola Wyer, Keith Couper, Peter K Kimani, Rebecca Kandiyali, Asmaa El-Banna, Dalia Barghouthy, Rebekah Haylett, Elizabeth King and 5 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06159868 (Physiotherapy and Optimised Enteral Nutrition In the Post-acute Phase of Critical Illness), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06159868 nacompletednot on this map

Physiotherapy and Optimised Enteral Nutrition In the Post-acute Phase of Critical Illness (PHOENIX): A Randomised Controlled Feasibility Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS TrustRan2024 to 2025Enrolled60ConditionsCritical IllnessArmsStructured physiotherapy and rehabilitation, Standard care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

David McWilliamsCentre for Care Excellence, Coventry University, Coventry, UK.
Owen GustafsonOxford Allied Health Professions Research and Innovation Unit, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
Nicola WyerUniversity Hospitals Coventry & Warwickshire NHS Trust, UK.
Keith CouperWarwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Peter K KimaniWarwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Rebecca KandiyaliWarwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Asmaa El-BannaWarwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Dalia BarghouthyUniversity Hospitals Coventry & Warwickshire NHS Trust, UK.
Rebekah HaylettOxford Allied Health Professions Research and Innovation Unit, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
Elizabeth KingOxford Allied Health Professions Research and Innovation Unit, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
Holly RichardsonUniversity Hospitals Coventry & Warwickshire NHS Trust, UK.
Miles Negus-FanceyPatient representative, UK.
Louise GalliePatient representative, UK.
Violet MatthewsUniversity Hospitals Coventry & Warwickshire NHS Trust, UK.
Zudin PuthuchearyWilliam Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Survivors of critical illness commonly experience prolonged physical and functional impairment related to muscle wasting, catabolism, and malnutrition. Rehabilitation and nutritional support beyond the intensive care unit (ICU) are frequently inconsistent, and deficits persist following ICU discharge. Although combined rehabilitation and nutritional interventions may support recovery, their feasibility in the post-ICU hospital setting is uncertain. Methods: PHOENIX was a mixed-methods, parallel group, open-label randomised controlled feasibility trial conducted in two United Kingdom university hospitals. Adult ICU survivors who had received four or more days of advanced respiratory support and with ongoing physiotherapy and dietetic rehabilitation needs at ICU discharge were recruited. Participants were randomly allocated to either an ICU-initiated, enhanced physiotherapy and optimised nutrition intervention or usual care. Primary feasibility outcomes were recruitment rate, retention at 30 days, and intervention fidelity. Secondary outcomes, collected to inform a future definitive trial, included days alive and out of hospital at 30 days (DAOH30), physical function, nutritional status, and quality of life. The trial was prospectively registered (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06159868). Findings: Between May 2024 and January 2025, 172 patients were screened, of whom 60 met eligibility criteria and all consented to participate. Recruitment targets were achieved within eight months, and retention at 30 days was 100%. Enhanced physiotherapy was delivered on 81% of available days, exceeding the predefined feasibility threshold of 70%. Delivery of prescribed nutritional targets was feasible, with intake fidelity exceeding progression criteria for both calories (75.2%) and protein (83.7%). Interpretation: A combined enhanced physiotherapy and optimised nutrition intervention following ICU discharge is feasible, with high recruitment, retention, and intervention fidelity. A definitive multicentre randomised controlled trial is now warranted to evaluate clinical and cost-effectiveness. Funding: This project is funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) under its Research for Patient Benefit (RfPB) Programme (Grant Reference Number NIHR205370).

Indexed as

Critical illnessIntensive care unitNutritionRehabilitationSurvivorship

Identifiers

PMID42326381
PMCPMC13276347

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.