ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
Baseline
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To develop baseline ¹ Methods: Patients with DLBCL who underwent baseline Results: A total of 148 patients (101 EMR, 47 non-EMR) were randomly split into training (n = 103) and test (n = 45) sets. This retrospective single-center study used the training set for feature selection and model development, and the test set exclusively for final evaluation. We developed habitat radiomics and dual-channel deep learning models; multilayer perceptron and DenseNet-161 were selected as the optimal architectures, respectively. In the test set, the habitat radiomics model (Habitat_MLP) achieved an AUC of 0.871 (95% CI: 0.7563-0.9857), with a specificity of 0.903, and accuracy of 0.822, showing higher overall performance than the dual-channel deep learning model (DL_DenseNet161), which achieved an AUC of 0.793 (95% CI: 0.6409-0.9444), specificity of 0.677, and accuracy of 0.711. Furthermore, the Habitat_MLP model showed more favorable calibration, higher net benefit on DCA, and improved risk reclassification in this dataset. Conclusion: The habitat radiomics model derived from baseline
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.