SynthesisFrontiers in oncology2026
Multiple primary head and neck cancers: a scenario-based framework for diagnosis and modern multidisciplinary management.
Synthesis in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Multiple primary tumours (MPT) involving the head and neck represent a growing and insufficiently systematised challenge in contemporary head and neck oncology. Patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) face a cumulative risk of 2-4% per year of developing a second primary malignancy, driven by field cancerisation, persistent exposure to tobacco and alcohol, and improved survival after multimodality treatment. Methods: Observational analysis of patients with ICD-10 C00-C14 and C30-C32 diagnoses treated in a university otolaryngology-head and neck surgery department over a two-year period (2024-2025), with specific focus on cases fulfilling criteria for MPT, was performed. Detailed clinical, pathological and treatment variables for the first and subsequent primaries were extracted and summarised, and illustrative cases were organised into a predefined 2 × 2 clinical matrix: (1) synchronous primaries confined to the head and neck; (2) synchronous HNSCC with an extra head and neck primary; (3) metachronous primaries within the head and neck; and (4) metachronous HNSCC with a non-head and neck malignancy. Results: Among 274 consecutive patients treated for HNSCC, 15 (5.5%) were identified as having MPT. These encompassed all four matrix scenarios and included combinations of laryngeal and oropharyngeal carcinomas, salivary gland tumours, hepatocellular carcinoma, prostate cancer and renal tumours. Across scenarios, optimal care required systematic diagnostic work-up (panendoscopy, high-quality cross-sectional imaging, meticulous histopathology), multidisciplinary discussion, and tailored use of contemporary modalities such as IMRT (including re-irradiation), transoral surgery and immune checkpoint inhibitors. In older, multi-morbid patients, comprehensive geriatric assessment emerged as pivotal for balancing curative intent against toxicity and functional outcome. Conclusions: Multiple primary head and neck cancers constitute a distinct, non-rare workload in tertiary practice and cannot be adequately addressed by isolated case reports or generic HNSCC pathways. A scenario-based framework, operationalised through a 2 × 2 clinical matrix with scenario-specific diagnostic and therapeutic checklists, provides a pragmatic tool to standardise evaluation, structure tumour board deliberations, and align increasingly complex IMRT and immunotherapy-era treatment options with patient prognosis, comorbidity, and values.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.