ArticleCureus2026
Reconsidering Surgical Intervention for Infection After Cranioplasty in Older Adults: A Case Report.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Post-cranioplasty infection with scalp breakdown in older adults poses a difficult reconstructive problem, particularly when frailty and cognitive impairment may limit tolerance for staged procedures. Although debridement, infection control, and delayed cranioplasty are often considered standard management, the extent of reconstruction that should be pursued in elderly patients remains uncertain. We report the case of a woman in her late 80s who developed scalp loss with exposure of a synthetic cranial implant eight months after cranioplasty following surgery for acute subdural hematoma. On admission, head computed tomography showed no intracranial infection, while three-dimensional computed tomography angiography demonstrated preserved patency of the superficial temporal artery with residual blood supply around the defect. Because her advanced age, cognitive impairment, and the anticipated burden of staged reconstruction raised concern about tolerance for repeated procedures, treatment was directed toward infection control and durable wound closure without repeat cranioplasty. Removal of the implant revealed an epidural abscess, and thorough debridement was performed. Under the infected artificial dura, a well-formed fibrous capsule was identified and used for duraplasty. The scalp defect was reconstructed with a free latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap and split-thickness skin grafting. No recurrent infection developed, although postoperative delirium limited rehabilitation and functional recovery. This case highlights that delayed recognition of wound complications in cognitively vulnerable older adults can allow progression to extensive defects and that omission of cranioplasty may be a reasonable endpoint in selected patients when durable soft-tissue coverage and infection control take precedence over anatomical restoration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.