ArticleCureus2026
Acral Subcorneal Hematoma Mimicking Melanoma: Dermoscopic Features and Exploratory Digital Color Analysis.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acral pigmented lesions pose a diagnostic challenge due to the overlap between benign entities, such as subcorneal hematoma, and acral melanoma. Dermoscopy is a key noninvasive tool that aids in differentiation by revealing subsurface structures not visible to the naked eye. We report the case of a 54-year-old man presenting with an asymptomatic acral pigmented macule on the volar aspect of the finger. Clinically, the lesion appeared dark reddish-brown, raising concern for a melanocytic process; however, dermoscopic evaluation revealed a homogeneous, predominantly red, structureless pattern without melanocytic features. Based on these findings, a subcorneal hematoma was diagnosed, and a conservative approach was adopted. To further explore the discrepancy between clinical and dermoscopic appearance, exploratory digital image analysis was performed. RGB histogram analysis demonstrated a predominance of the red channel in both clinical and dermoscopic images, with a greater relative contribution under dermoscopy. Additional evaluation using the CIELAB color space confirmed the presence of red chromatic components and revealed a shift in relative chromatic contrast between the lesion and surrounding skin. These findings are exploratory and serve to support, rather than establish, the observed optical phenomenon. This case suggests that dermoscopy enhances the visibility and relative contrast of pre-existing chromatic components through optical modulation, rather than generating new information. The observed clinical-dermoscopic discrepancy highlights the role of optical factors and contrast modulation in color perception and underscores the value of dermoscopy in increasing diagnostic confidence and potentially avoiding unnecessary biopsy in appropriate clinical contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.