ReviewCureus2026
Oral Corticosteroid Therapy in Lumbar Radiculopathy: Evidence From Randomized Controlled Trials.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Oral corticosteroids are frequently prescribed for lumbar radicular pain, despite uncertainty regarding their clinical benefit. Electronic databases, including MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, Scopus, and PubMed, were searched from inception to identify randomized controlled trials assessing oral corticosteroids for lumbar radicular pain. The primary outcome was functional improvement, while secondary outcomes included pain intensity, quality of life, patient-reported improvement, need for surgery, and adverse events. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool, and due to heterogeneity across studies, results were synthesized narratively. Four trials involving 369 participants were included. One placebo-controlled trial demonstrated a modest but statistically significant improvement in disability with oral corticosteroids, without a corresponding reduction in pain intensity. Two additional placebo-controlled trials found no significant between-group differences in pain or function. An active-comparator trial reported lower pain scores with oral corticosteroids compared with pregabalin or gabapentin, although interpretation was limited by methodological concerns. Quality-of-life outcomes were inconsistent, rates of surgery did not differ between groups, and oral corticosteroids were associated with more frequent short-term adverse events. Overall, oral corticosteroids may provide modest functional benefit in lumbar radiculopathy but do not consistently reduce pain or the need for surgery and are associated with increased short-term adverse effects, indicating that their use should be individualized with careful consideration of potential benefits and harms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.