ArticleCureus2026
Persona-Driven Vignettes: A Novel Needs Assessment and Audit Tool for Faculty Development.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prompted by COVID-19, an academic health sciences center's health professions faculty development office underwent a digital transformation in 2020. This disruption afforded an opportunity to launch a new approach to comprehensive and rapid needs assessment. An inter-professional team of health professions educators used a novel storytelling technique to design vignettes featuring fictionalized personas representative of a diverse faculty. Faculty members from a spectrum of teaching practices created vignettes about fictionalized personas based on their lived experiences as faculty. The resulting document was peer reviewed by faculty development team members. Learning objectives were distilled from the vignettes and compiled into a list of items. Redundant items were removed. The items were further analyzed and indexed to reflect the natural life cycle of a faculty member, from recruitment to retirement. Finally, the team reviewed the items and identified resources to address them. Faculty members created a compilation document that described seven unique faculty journeys through a series of persona-driven vignettes. From this document, three co-authors identified and articulated a collection of learning objectives. After review, 70 learning objectives remained. Most learning objectives (69%, 48/70) could be fully or partially addressed by existing faculty development resources, either locally curated or openly accessible in the literature or online. This process revealed that several gaps in faculty development resources (31%, 22/70) required creation, adaptation, or revision of content. Using this "vignettes" method, the authors quickly identified gaps in the current resource bank. Like a road map, the list of items defines our tasks to work toward a comprehensive faculty development resource and assess our team's progress. This method of rapid needs assessment can be replicated in other institutions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.