ArticleCureus2026
Implementing a Weekend Inpatient Robotics Program Using the Plan-Do-Study-Act Method: A Quality Improvement Initiative by Occupational Therapy Students.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose This quality improvement project assessed the feasibility, safety, and patient acceptability of a student-assisted weekend robotics program in an inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF), with an exploratory analysis of functional outcomes. Occupational therapists in an inpatient rehabilitation unit created and assessed a sustainable weekend robotics program for patients. Materials and methods The inaugural weekend program was developed using a quality improvement framework, the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) method, which aligns with the knowledge translation framework. A small, random sample of patient data was assessed to determine the efficacy of the program and the utility of the measurements for future cycles. Results Over 12 weeks, 55 patients received 120 weekend robotic sessions and showed improved shoulder flexion and high satisfaction (98% positive). Patient diagnoses included neurologic, pulmonary, and orthopedic conditions. Detailed errors in the data were identified, and these supported the quality improvement cycle as researchers learned from the issues identified. Conclusion The successes of the program included its sustainability and approval for further PDSA cycles, suggesting that weekend robotics can enhance therapy dosage and patient engagement. The failures involved methodology issues with measurements, data collection and consistency, and student and therapist training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.