ReviewCureus2026
Anatomical Approaches for Insertion Sites of External Ventricular Drainage Catheters.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
External ventricular drains (EVDs) are widely used in neurosurgery to control intracranial pressure, divert cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and facilitate monitoring in acute neurological and neurosurgical conditions. Accurate catheter placement is essential, as anatomical trajectory and insertion site directly influence efficacy and complication rates. This review summarizes the major anatomical entry points for EVD insertion, including Kocher's, Frazier's, Keen's, occipital-parietal, and Dandy's points, and discusses the rationale, advantages, and limitations associated with each approach. Commonly used techniques, such as freehand landmark-based placement, stereotactic guidance, neuronavigation, ultrasound-assisted insertion, and endoscopic methods, are reviewed in the context of accuracy and clinical applicability. Reported outcomes demonstrate high cannulation success with standard approaches, while complications such as infection, hemorrhage, catheter misplacement, and obstruction remain significant considerations. Key patient-, procedure-, and maintenance-related risk factors are highlighted, along with evidence-based recommendations to improve safety and reduce variability in clinical practice. As technological developments continue to advance catheter design and placement guidance, understanding anatomical strategies and standardized care protocols remains essential for optimizing EVD effectiveness. This review provides a comprehensive, practical overview intended to support neurosurgeons and critical care clinicians in selecting safe insertion sites and minimizing procedure-related complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.