Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42326207›Full record

ReviewCureus2026

Artificial Intelligence and Robotics in General Surgery: Opportunities and Challenges.

Sepehr Seifi, Hadi Sahrai, Negin Safari Dehnavi, Fatemeh Amiri, Seyed Mohammad Amin Dashti, Ali Noruzi, Niloofar Taheri, Reza Mosaddeghi-Heris, Ali Seifi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sepehr SeifiDepartment of Surgery, Arkansas College of Osteopathic Medicine, Fort Smith, USA.
Hadi SahraiStudent Research Committee, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, IRN.
Negin Safari DehnaviSina Trauma and Surgery Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IRN.
Fatemeh AmiriSchool of Medicine Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, IRN.
Seyed Mohammad Amin DashtiSchool of Medicine Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IRN.
Ali NoruziStudent Research Committee, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, IRN.
Niloofar TaheriDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Paolo Alto, USA.
Reza Mosaddeghi-HerisNeurology, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, IRN.
Ali SeifiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Division of Neurocritical Care, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence and robotics are reshaping general surgery across the full perioperative continuum. This narrative review traces the history of surgical robotics from early teleoperated systems developed by NASA and the US Department of Defense to the current da Vinci Xi and SP platforms and examines how AI is now being applied at each phase of surgical care. In the preoperative setting, machine learning models outperform traditional risk scores in predicting postoperative complications, while deep learning applied to computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) improves tumor detection, lymph node staging, and surgical planning. Intraoperatively, AI-driven phase recognition systems achieve 85-95% accuracy in identifying procedural steps, computer vision tools assess the Critical View of Safety during laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and semi-autonomous robotic systems are beginning to reduce surgeon tremor and automate discrete operative tasks. In the postoperative period, AI-integrated wearable biosensors and electronic health record models enable earlier detection of complications such as sepsis and deep vein thrombosis, while personalized ERAS protocols are refined through continuous data streams. Despite these advances, significant challenges remain, including dataset bias, limited external validation, black-box model opacity, and unresolved questions around data privacy, liability, and regulatory oversight. AI currently functions as a decision-support tool rather than an autonomous actor. Broader clinical adoption will require larger multi-institutional datasets, improved model interpretability, and clear regulatory frameworks.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencedeep learninggeneral surgeryintraoperative decision supportmachine learningperioperative carepostoperative complicationspreoperative risk predictionrobotic surgerysurgical robotics

Identifiers

PMID42326207
PMCPMC13283024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.