ArticleCureus2026
Personalised Interventions for Self-Harm in High-Risk Adolescents: A Case Report.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Self-harm in adolescents is a complex clinical challenge often driven by profound emotional dysregulation and complicated by trauma history. This report describes the case of a 14-year-old female patient with a history of sexual abuse, post-traumatic stress disorder, and major depressive disorder, who was repeatedly hospitalised for severe self-inflicted wounds. Despite multiple hospitalisations following suicide attempts and low initial motivation for psychotherapy, a multidisciplinary team implemented a modified therapeutic approach. Due to the patient's inability to participate in high-intensity dialectical behaviour therapy (DBT), a customised harm-reduction strategy was employed, featuring formal behavioural agreements, environmental controls, and a tangible reward system. The core component of this approach was a structured behavioural agreement, which was formulated by the clinical team, the patient, and her mother, to maintain environmental control and promote transparency. This intervention focused on stabilising wound severity and improving transparency rather than immediate cessation. Over the course of treatment, this individualised strategy led to a significant reduction in self-harm frequency, improved treatment adherence, and served as a clinical bridge towards more intensive therapeutic engagement. The case suggests that for high-risk adolescents with fluctuating motivation and treatment nonconformity, customised harm-reduction and modified DBT-informed strategies can effectively manage immediate risk while fostering long-term recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.