Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42326184›Full record

ReviewCureus2026

Efficacy and Safety of Balloon Dilatation of the Eustachian Tube in Children With Eustachian Tube Dysfunction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Zainab Zujaj, Muhammad Shiraz Yousaf Siddiqui, Ayesha Mansoor, Dipak Chaulagain, Muhammad Shoaib Shahid, Usama Assad-Ullah Maurice Nonnenmacher, Saima Saeed, Nneoma Sam-Odum, Muhammad Abdullah Farooq Cheema, Zeeshan Alvi and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Zainab ZujajMedicine, Al Nafees Medical College and Hospital, Islamabad, PAK.
Muhammad Shiraz Yousaf SiddiquiMedicine, Islamic International Medical College, Islamabad, PAK.
Ayesha MansoorSpecial Pathology/Community Medicine/ENT/Opthalmology, Faisalabad Medical University and Allied Hospital, Faisalabad, PAK.
Dipak ChaulagainNeurosurgery, Uzhhorod National University, Uzhhorod, UKR.
Muhammad Shoaib ShahidMorphology, Jalal-Abad International University, Jalal-Abad, KGZ.
Usama Assad-Ullah Maurice NonnenmacherOtolaryngology, Faisalabad Medical University and Allied Hospital, Faisalabad, PAK.
Saima SaeedPediatrics, Border Health Services, Ministry of National Health Services, Regulations and Coordination, Rawalpindi, PAK.
Nneoma Sam-OdumOtolaryngology, Rivers State University Teaching Hospital, Port Harcourt, NGA.
Muhammad Abdullah Farooq CheemaMedicine and Surgery, Jalal-Abad State University named after B.Osmonov Medical Faculty, Jalal-Abad, KGZ.
Zeeshan AlviMedicine, York St John University, York, GBR.
Mandeep KumarMedicine, Jinnah Medical and Dental College, Karachi, PAK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The meta-analysis and systematic review evaluated the efficacy and safety of balloon dilatation of the eustachian tube (BDET) in children with eustachian tube dysfunction. The PubMed, Cochrane Library, and ScienceDirect databases were searched in depth to identify relevant studies, and eight retrospective cohort studies were selected. A total of 652 patients were included in these studies. There were no serious complications, and only minor, self-limiting adverse events were seen, the most common of which were epistaxis and a patulous eustachian tube. The primary result was an improvement in the type of tympanogram, and the secondary results were the risk of failure and complications. The pooled analysis of seven studies showed that 64% (95%CI: 50-78%) of cases demonstrated improvement in tympanogram following BDET. However, heterogeneity was high (I² = 90.7%). The pooled failure rate, based on four studies, was 13% (95%CI: 1-17%). Although the evidence on the efficacy and safety of BDET in pediatric patients is encouraging, the overall quality of evidence is limited by the retrospective nature of the included studies, the absence of control groups, and inconsistent outcome measures. These results indicate that BDET may be a useful, minimally invasive procedure for treating eustachian tube dysfunction in children. However, more specific randomized controlled trials with standardized outcome measures are needed to clarify the treatment's long-term effectiveness and its role in clinical practice.

Indexed as

balloon dilatationeustachian tube dysfunctionmeta-analysisotitis mediapediatricsafetytreatment outcomestympanogram

Identifiers

PMID42326184
PMCPMC13280604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.