ArticleCureus2026
Radiographic Predictors of Spinal Column Instability After Gunshot Wounds: A Pragmatic Score.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Firearm injuries to the spinal column remain a major public health concern in the United States and present a challenge in assessing spinal stability. Currently, no scoring system exists to evaluate ballistic injuries to the spinal column. We propose the Ballistic Assessment in Spine Trauma (BLAST) score to differentiate stable from unstable ballistic spine fractures for the purpose of operative stabilization. Methods Over approximately 14 years, the neurosurgical service at the University of Mississippi Medical Center evaluated 353 gunshot wounds (GSWs) to the spine. Patients with radiographic injury to the spinal column were included and evaluated using the BLAST score in this retrospective chart review study. Results Our results indicate that a score of 6 or greater correlates with operative management. Overall, the BLAST score performed comparably to the accuracy reported in validation studies of the Subaxial Cervical Spine Injury Classification System (SLICS), Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Scale (TLICS), and Spinal Instability Neoplastic Scale (SINS). The BLAST score achieved receiver operating characteristic (ROC) area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.965 and 0.812 for cervical and thoracolumbar injuries, respectively. The scoring system also demonstrated kappa statistics of 0.39 and 0.40 and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) of 0.82 and 0.79 for the cervical and thoracolumbar spine, respectively. Conclusion The BLAST score offers an efficient, accurate, and pragmatic composite scoring system that can differentiate stable from unstable spinal injuries caused by GSWs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.