Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42326161›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

ItemSight: Development of a Shiny Application for Simplified Item Analysis of Type A Multiple-Choice Questions.

Himel Mondal, Pradosh Kumar Sarangi, Shaikat Mondal, Anupkumar D Dhanvijay, Rintu K Gayen, Aritra Mukhopadhyay, Raunak Mishra

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Himel MondalPhysiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Deoghar, Deoghar, IND.
Pradosh Kumar SarangiRadiodiagnosis, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Deoghar, Deoghar, IND.
Shaikat MondalPhysiology, Raiganj Government Medical College and Hospital, Raiganj, IND.
Anupkumar D DhanvijayPhysiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Deoghar, Deoghar, IND.
Rintu K GayenElectronics and Communication Engineering, Institute of Engineering and Management, Kolkata, IND.
Aritra MukhopadhyayElectronics and Communication Engineering, Institute of Engineering and Management, Kolkata, IND.
Raunak MishraElectronics and Communication Engineering, Institute of Engineering and Management, Kolkata, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Item analysis is a vital step in educational assessment to check the quality of multiple-choice questions (items). Traditional item analysis methods using spreadsheets or statistical software are often time-consuming, error-prone, and challenging for educators with limited programming expertise. To address these issues, ItemSight, an intuitive software for item analysis, was developed to automate and simplify the psychometric evaluation of test items. The software was developed using the R-Shiny framework. It computes item difficulty, discrimination index, distractor efficiency, internal consistency (if an item is deleted), and point-biserial correlation. To run the software, users need R and RStudio with installed packages and the code we provide. After analysis, the report can be easily exported in comma-separated values (CSV) format for further analysis. All data remains stored locally on the user's computer, ensuring privacy. Currently, the software supports only type A multiple-choice questions (four options with a single best answer). It can be accessed and used through RStudio without any cost. The tool serves as a valuable resource for educators and researchers in medical and allied health sciences, promoting evidence-based improvement of assessment quality.

Indexed as

educational assessmentitem analysismultiple-choice questionsreliabilityshiny applicationtest quality

Identifiers

PMID42326161
PMCPMC13277699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.