ReviewCureus2026
Emergency Department to Inpatient Care Transition: A Narrative Review of Handover Failures, Diagnostic Momentum, and Patient Safety.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The transition of care from the emergency department (ED) to inpatient services is a high-risk clinical boundary in acute medical admissions. During this process, the patient, clinical information, diagnostic reasoning, therapeutic responsibility, pending investigations, and escalation plans must move together. When this transfer is incomplete, patients may be vulnerable to missed results, medication discrepancies, unclear ownership, delayed escalation, and diagnostic momentum, where a provisional ED label becomes accepted by subsequent teams without adequate reassessment. This narrative review examines handover failures, diagnostic momentum, and patient-safety risks during ED-to-inpatient care transitions. It also discusses how these transitions differ across health-system structures, including hospitalist-based models, acute medical take pathways, consultant-unit systems, ward transfers, high-dependency units (HDU), and intensive care settings. Common vulnerabilities include incomplete communication of illness severity, working diagnosis, diagnostic uncertainty, treatment response, pending tests, medication risks, and contingency plans. Structured communication tools such as SBAR (Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation) and I-PASS (Illness Severity, Patient Summary, Action List, Situation Awareness and Contingency Planning, Synthesis by Receiver) may improve reliability when adapted to local workflows, supported by training, and paired with receiver confirmation. The review proposes practical handover elements for acute medical admissions, emphasizing illness severity, key differentials, pending tasks, medication reconciliation, escalation triggers, and explicit accountability for follow-up. The ED-to-inpatient transition should be treated as an active patient-safety intervention rather than a purely administrative movement of the patient. Clear communication of uncertainty, trajectory, and responsibility may reduce preventable harm during acute medical admissions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.