Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42326146›Full record

ReviewCureus2026

Warm Versus Cold Irrigation in Brain Surgery: A Comprehensive Review.

Allison Shay, Heather K Johnston, Akshar G Patel, Louis Reier, Mohammad Arshad, Javed Siddiqi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Allison ShayDepartment of Clinical Sciences, St. George's University School of Medicine, St. George's, GRD.
Heather K JohnstonDepartment of Medical Education, California University of Science and Medicine, Colton, USA.
Akshar G PatelNeuro Intensive Care Unit, Arrowhead Regional Medical Center, Colton, USA.
Louis ReierDepartment of Neurosurgery, Graduate Medical Education, Arrowhead Regional Medical Center, Colton, USA.
Mohammad ArshadDepartment of Neurosurgery, Desert Regional Medical Center, Palm Springs, USA.
Javed SiddiqiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Riverside University Health System Medical Center, Moreno Valley, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Irrigation is used in every brain surgery operation, yet the optimal temperature of irrigation fluid remains poorly defined and is a topic of debate among neurosurgeons. The majority of neurosurgeons who use warm irrigation cite maintaining normothermia and its perceived hemostatic benefit as their main reasons. However, basic science, neurophysiology, and clinical data challenge the rationale for warm irrigation and suggest that cold irrigation is more advantageous given its neuroprotective properties. Hyperthermia exacerbates neuronal injury, increases metabolic demand, lowers seizure threshold, and worsens outcomes following CNS injury. Conversely, hypothermia reduces intracranial pressure, decreases cerebral metabolism, limits oxidative damage, and improves outcomes in numerous injury models. This review synthesizes the available literature on irrigation temperature in cranial neurosurgery and argues that cold irrigation is superior because it is physiologically consistent with the principles of neuroprotection, metabolic suppression, and seizure prevention.

Indexed as

cold irrigationhypothermiaintraoperative thermoregulationirrigation temperatureneuroprotectionselective brain coolingwarm irrigation

Identifiers

PMID42326146
PMCPMC13275198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.