ArticleCureus2026
Low Energy Availability in Male Indian Athletes: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLow energy availability (LEA) is a mismatch between dietary energy intake and training-related expenditure that can impair performance, recovery, endocrine function, bone health, and overall athlete well-being; it is most often expected in endurance, weight-category, and physique-sensitive sports but can occur across disciplines. In male athletes, LEA is under-recognized because symptoms are subtle and non-specific and are frequently attributed to training fatigue. Because abrupt workload fluctuations may further strain recovery, the acute to chronic workload ratio (ACWR) provides a practical field marker of recent load spikes and a rationale for examining workload alongside LEA screening.
objectiveTo determine the occurrence of LEA in young Indian athletes with the LEAM-Q questionnaire and determine the association with Acute on Chronic Workload Ratio (ACWR).
methodsThis cross-sectional analysis included 30 male athletes (18-35 years) from boxing, judo, and weightlifting. LEAM-Q responses were screened using the validated sex drive criterion. ACWR was calculated as (7-day workload x weekly RPE)/([monthly workload/4] x monthly RPE). Descriptive statistics were reported as mean ± standard deviation or median (IQR), and between-group comparisons were performed using the chi-square test, Fisher's exact test, Mann-Whitney U test, and Spearman rank correlation as appropriate (p<0.05).
resultsTwelve athletes (40.0%) screened positive for LEA. Screen positivity differed significantly by sport: boxing 3/14 (21.4%), judo 3/8 (37.5%), and weightlifting 6/8 (75.0%) (chi-square=6.12, p=0.047; Cramer's V=0.45). Weightlifting athletes had higher odds of screening positive than non-weightlifters (Fisher's exact OR 8.0, p=0.034). The median sex-drive score was 3 (IQR 2-4). Median ACWR was 0.89 (IQR 0.75-1.00); 9 athletes (30.0%) were below the normal range, 19 (63.3%) were within the normal range (0.8-1.3), and 2 (6.7%) were above the high-risk threshold (>1.3). ACWR did not differ between LEA screen-positive and screen-negative athletes (median 0.89 vs. 0.89; p=0.966) and showed no correlation with LEAM-Q score (Spearman rho=0.05, p=0.805).
conclusionLEAM-Q identified a substantial burden of low energy availability risk in this cohort of young Indian male athletes, with the strongest signal in weightlifting and the most consistent abnormalities in sex drive items. ACWR was largely within the normal range and did not differentiate screen-positive athletes in this sample. These findings support routine LEAM-Q-based screening in male athletes, especially in weight-sensitive sports, and reinforce the need for early nutritional and clinical evaluation when the screen is positive.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.