ArticleCureus2026
Is Early Injection-Site Reaction Associated With the Efficacy of Romosozumab?
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Injection-site reactions (ISRs) associated with romosozumab may indicate immune activation that influences bone mineral density (BMD) response, aligning with the concept of "immunoporosis." This study aimed to investigate whether early ISRs following romosozumab administration are associated with greater increases in BMD in women with primary osteoporosis. Methods We conducted a sub-analysis of a previously reported prospective cohort study involving 181 untreated Japanese women aged 52-100 years with primary osteoporosis who began a 12-month course of romosozumab. Patients were categorized into an ISR group (n=44) and a non-ISR group (n=137) based on the occurrence of ISRs within the first six months of treatment. Percent changes in lumbar spine (LS), total hip (TH), and femoral neck (FN) BMD at six and 12 months were compared between groups using Student's t-test or Fisher's exact test. Results The ISR group exhibited significantly greater increases in LS BMD compared to the non-ISR group at six months (12.8% vs. 9.5%, p=0.039) and 12 months (18.0% vs. 14.4%, p=0.046). In contrast, no significant differences were detected between groups in TH BMD at six months (3.5% vs. 2.9%, p=0.647) or 12 months (6.7% vs. 5.5%, p=0.330), or in FN BMD at six months (4.0% vs. 3.5%, p=0.588) or 12 months (6.7% vs. 5.4%, p=0.326). Conclusion ISR could serve as a no-cost and clinically observable indicator associated with LS BMD response to romosozumab that requires no additional testing. Further studies are needed to validate this hypothesis and clarify the underlying mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.