Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42326122›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Immunotherapy-Induced Glutamic Acid Decarboxylase 65 Cerebellitis.

Alysse Jensen, Hardik Thakkar, Scott Kramer, Jacqueline Young

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alysse JensenInternal Medicine, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, USA.
Hardik ThakkarInternal Medicine, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, USA.
Scott KramerInternal Medicine, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, USA.
Jacqueline YoungInternal Medicine, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are an important treatment modality for advanced cancer. However, they carry the risk of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) secondary to their mechanism of action. ICI medications function by inhibiting the checkpoints that suppress immune cells, which exist to prevent autoimmunity, and prime these cells to attack and eliminate cancer. While ICIs have substantially improved the prognosis for patients with advanced cancer, some patients experience adverse effects from this autoimmune state. One less common, but potentially life-threatening toxicity is cerebellitis. We present a case of anti-glutamic acid decarboxylase 65 (anti-GAD 65) related ICI cerebellitis in a patient with uterine carcinosarcoma on dostarlimab. This patient presented with nonspecific symptoms, including fatigue and a concerning symptom of ataxia. Full neurological evaluation demonstrated anti-GAD 65 antibodies in both her serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). She was unable to start outpatient treatment and was admitted for intravenous steroids and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) with subsequent improvement in her symptoms. She was placed on a prolonged steroid taper with regular IVIG infusions. Her immunotherapy was discontinued. This case report highlights the importance of early clinical suspicion of ICI-related neurotoxicities and rapid treatment initiation. Prompt recognition and early intervention are important to minimize long-term disability.

Indexed as

gad 65glutamic acid decarboxylase antibodies (gad-65)ici cerebellitisici neuroimmune check point inhibitor adverse effectsimmune checkpoint inhibitor adverse effectsimmune checkpoint inhibitors (icis)neuro-oncologyoncology

Identifiers

PMID42326122
PMCPMC13282768

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.