ArticleCureus2026
Educational Impact of a 30-Minute Ultrasound Training Lecture on Medial Meniscus Extrusion Measurements: A Pilot Study of Intra- and Inter-rater Reliability Among Novice Students.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMedial meniscus extrusion (MME) is a pivotal biomarker for knee osteoarthritis progression. Although ultrasonography offers a dynamic and cost-effective MME assessment, its clinical utility is often limited by the perceived high barrier of examiner proficiency. This study evaluated the educational impact of a brief, standardized training session on the reliability of MME measurements obtained by novice physical therapy students compared to those obtained by an experienced physical therapist (PT).
methodsThe participants in this pilot study comprised eight healthy young adults (16 knees), one experienced PT (eight years of experience), and two third-year students (Students A and B) without prior MME measurement experience. The students attended a targeted 30-minute lecture on knee sonoanatomy and MME measurement protocols. MME was measured under weight-bearing (WB) and non-WB (NWB) conditions using a longitudinal scan directly beneath the medial collateral ligament. Reliability was assessed via intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC(1, 1) and ICC(2, 1)) and a Bland-Altman analysis.
resultsFollowing the 30-minute session, both students achieved moderate intra-rater reliability (ICC(1, 1): 0.693-0.705). Inter-rater agreement with the PT was highly inconsistent across conditions and individuals; for the WB condition, Student B demonstrated excellent agreement (ICC(2, 1): 0.895), whereas Student A demonstrated poor agreement (0.204). For the NWB condition, Student A showed moderate agreement (ICC(2, 1): 0.589), whereas Student B showed poor agreement (0.220). The Bland-Altman analysis identified a proportional bias only for Student A's intra-rater measurements (between the second and third trials) under the NWB condition. Random errors (minimal detectable change at 95% confidence level (MDC95)) were 0.34-0.50 mm for student intra-rater trials and 0.40-0.65 mm for inter-rater comparisons.
conclusionsA 30-minute educational intervention enabled novice physical therapy students to occasionally achieve expert-level reliability for specific conditions; however, it did not ensure consistent proficiency across different physical settings. The significant variability between the students and the presence of proportional bias in NWB measurements suggest that theoretical knowledge alone is insufficient to master the technical nuances of MME ultrasonography. These findings highlight the potential for ultrasound in clinical education while emphasizing the necessity of intensive hands-on training and feedback to bridge the gap between novice and expert performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.